It’s not too late to help some women get to the AMC

July 2, 2009 by joankelly6000

Copied and pasted from Hermana, Resist:

Y porque no?

posted by: Noemi

AMC.
We need to get there.
We have fundraised, asked for grants, compromised, felt energized, asked for days off, gotten free airline tickets, borrowed time, overcharged credit cards and emailed/talked/made plans with friends and strangers across the lines.
And still call us shameless, we ask for more. Y porque no?

please consider donating to these fine, chingona mujeres

Maegan “la Mala” Ortiz, raising chingona mujeres. Sending single mami love
laMamitaMala.com
mamitamala@yahoo.com

Elle, southern sistorian, who I shall meet one day even if we live closer than other folks. Oh we shall share a beer very very soon http://elleabd.blogspot.com
mselleg@aol.com

blackamazon Sydette otherwise known as the bad ass who I love
http://guyaneseterror.blogspot.com
Sydette@gmail.com

Fabiola, fabmexicana who guest blogs here, leaving pedacitos de su corazon. Otra mami soltera de Cali
fabmexicana@gmail.com

Noemi Martinez
spiller of dreams-single mami
hermanaresist.com

csdistro@gmail.com

ms. cripchick
a powerchair-roaring queer radical woman of color
cripchick’s weblog
stacey.milbern@gmail.com

Many of us will be taking part in the Women’s Media Equity
Summit on July 16th.
At the AMC, we’ll be involved in several different caucuses, meetings and generally raising
a ruckus wherever you may find us. And OUR KIDS WILL BE CAUSING ALL SORTS OF MAYHEM AT THE KIDS TRACK AND IN GENERAL. It will be a sight to see. Things will happen. We will write/blog about it.

***note – it’s mentioned in comments to this post that the email addresses listed above will work for PayPal donations.

Could any pro-Israeli person/people explain this to me

July 2, 2009 by joankelly6000

Because I can’t for the life of me understand even the faulty/dishonest reasoning anyone is telling themselves and each other in the Israeli government about what justifies forcibly keeping aid of any kind from reaching people trapped in Gaza right now. 

I don’t know why that is sticking in my craw – I mean I don’t know what difference it makes, what the official reasoning is.  I think it’s that in my head I just can’t imagine, I cannot believe, that people are outright saying “because fuck ‘em, that’s why!” 

I can’t believe that the Israeli government would be saying that outright, fuck ‘em and it’s cuz we hope they all die, and nobody would be doing a thing about it, to be precise.  That’s what floors me the most really.  It’s unfortunately not that shocking to me anymore – not a surprise – that Gazans are being imprisoned and starved and bombed and killed by the Israeli government. 

I just keep feeling like – okay so what lie is being told and what am I missing that everybody besides a small determined amount of private citizens (small in relation to the population of the world, I mean, not small like insignificant) is just going “oh okay, nothing to see here, moving on now…?”

I guess it’s impossible for my conscious mind to just accept that it really could be that nobody much cares, that no lie has to be told in the first place, much less believed, for this to be allowed to go on.

I’m grateful to people who are continually saying “no, fuck YOU” and sailing there and not-stopping even though they mostly get intercepted and/or arrested.  I’m grateful that people are able to do things that are at least not-nothing, and am hoping that people in Gaza will be freed some how.

Guh

July 1, 2009 by joankelly6000

Young people getting shot at bus stops, planes and trains crashing, I just don’t understand what the eff right now.

Ah, the deafening silence of hypocrisy

June 30, 2009 by joankelly6000

So pleased that a bunch of spineless, shitty-character-having fuckheads who had no fucking idea what they were talking about in the first place have followed their own policy of admitting it publicly when they fuck up – oh wait, they’re not?  Oh, you know what, must be because black women and other women of color deserved to be shit on that way anyway, even if this particular instance was a mis-call.

Voz clearly has some kind of personality disorder.  What is the rest of you’s fucking excuse?  You should be ashamed of your fucking selves.  Assholes.

ETA:  Feel free to jerk each other off to the tune of “anger is legitimate and let’s examine how it works” all you like – anyone who’s honest with themselves or anyone else either sees and/or says the truth in this: that not one fucking person said “don’t be mad!” or “don’t express your mad-ness!” or “could you please whisper while you say how mad you are!” 

One woman said “hm, I don’t like this that has been brought to my attention as it affects people I love and invovles people I respect, and I want to find out what’s up and what I can do about it, if anything” and got lied about and shat on for it.  For that alone.  By a fucking bully (oh poor you that some people are finally saying the word out loud) and a bunch of self-righteous idiots. 

Another woman said “hey I’m pretty sure [WHAT TURNED OUT TO BE FUCKING TRUE] and am uncomfortable with mischaracterizations” and she got shat on as well.

Neither woman did anything wrong, both were treated abusively.  But as I said, go right on with your disingenuous selves, pretending that what actually happened was that “people got understandably angry, it’s just too bad we’re all so wound up, understandably, that we get triggered before we know the facts.”  Pretend you don’t know the difference between abusive behavior and anger. 

That Johnny Cash picture is awesome, but doesn’t say the half of what I have on my lips for you jackasses.  Talk about anger indeed.

Also, could we stop riling up the North Korean government please?

June 25, 2009 by joankelly6000

“If the U.S. imperialists start another war, the army and people of Korea will … wipe out the aggressors on the globe once and for all,” a dispatch from the official Korean Central News Agency said.

Granted I know nothing about why the hell we’re at odds with North Korea in the first place, other than GW calling them evil rather abruptly a few years back.  I mean really, there aren’t a bunch of other nations where people are just as not-free and suffering where we don’t antagonize them to the point of them threatening to nuke us?  Do you know how crazy somebody has to be to threaten to nuke the US, one of the least-hesitantly aggressive, murderous powers in the history of whatever the hell?  Jesus.

These things aren’t the same but they wash over my mind together

June 25, 2009 by joankelly6000

This lady being separated from her baby because of racist misogyny hurts my heart.  Things that pop into my head:

1. If it’s really about being concerned for babies being born to mothers with (imagined in this case it seems) not enough materially/money-wise to take care of them, why aren’t all the social services and rich people leaving puffs of smoke where their bodies used to be as they rush off to ”rescue” all the babies and children in this country right now who are hungry and homeless?  I’m not saying that’d be the right thing, I’m saying it rings false to say that’s what this baby-stealing is about, when the conditions that supposedly offend your superior-child-raising-asses abound and with nary a peep out of you.

2. In California the public foster/adoption system requires that a child be in the system for 18 months before adoption proceedings can even BEGIN.  I hope it’s at least that long in Mississippi so that there’s still time to stop this madness.

3. I only know about the California laws because my friends are fostering a baby girl they hope to adopt.  She’s the now-almost-two-years-old daughter of a teenaged undocumented immigrant girl from Mexico.   I’m going to call the baby Violet here for privacy purposes.  I’m going to call Violet’s mother M.  I love them both, even though I’ve only met miss Violet.

——————————————————————————

I don’t even remember them telling me they were on the list again to take foster kids.  My friends, E and L, already had a son.  E and L are an interracial lesbian couple living in an affluent predominantly black neighborhood.  E’s not a lawyer and L stays home since their son came, but I would guess they are, if not in the same tax bracket as the baby-stealing lawyer couple above, certainly not far below.  They got to adopt their son straight away, as the birth parents wanted to give him up when he was born. 

Both parents signed papers, and both met with E and L.  Their son, A, had a cleft palate.  That’s why E and L were able to get to foster a newborn baby – that almost never happens in the public foster/adoption system, unless you’re willing to take black and brown and in any way disabled babies.  A’s parents are also Mexican immigrants.  [sidebar - can I tell you how much I choke on those words every time, as a California resident, living in what basically is long-occupied Mexico, but somehow Mexican people are immigrants here?]

So A’s still a toddler and I’m still getting over my fear of babies (A, plus my own niece and then nephew, basically hypnotized me with cuteness, to stop remembering that babies are unpredictable people who sometimes projectile vomit and accidentally shit on you – not my first choice for friends, I must tell you), and I’ve come over for our regular eat-dinner-and-hang-out date on a Saturday, and L’s holding a tiny bird in a blanket.

Surprise!  We got the call this morning from the foster-people, her name’s Violet and she’s four months old, sorry for disruption but things are a little crazy tonight!

Um, she looks like she would lose a fight to a hamster – are you sure she’s four months old?  It’s still hard to say it out loud, especially now that I’ve known and loved Violet for so long.  But, uh, her mom had not been feeding her.  She was literally skin hanging on tiny bones.  They didn’t mention the bruises until many months later.  Maybe that kind of excruciating information-share is not top of the list when you’re wrangling two babies and company just came over.

I was actually even more afraid of Violet that first night I met her than I normally am/was of babies.  One of my fears is of their vulnerability.  I find it unbearable.  I mean to say that my entire self wants to protect them, and is simultaneously wholly aware that it’s impossible, and so I panic to find a way to just stop knowing how vulnerable they are.  Avoiding babies really is the only way, if you’re wondering.  And so much for that idea.

This story has much ugliness in it, by the way, and I’m sorry to tell you something so disheartening, but Violet’s near-starvation and undetermined possible physical abuse is maybe the least ugly thing I will talk about.

I did try, though.  To avoid Violet.  I was afraid she wouldn’t make it – E and L seemed afraid.  Please god let her not-die and then if E and L could just not-invite me over until it’s gone one way or the other, that would be great.  Seriously instead of ghosts and goblins people should just put babies everywhere on Halloween.  Terrifying.

Of course E and L didn’t invite me over.  If you don’t already know this – when your friends have babies, you either invite yourself over (offering to bring food or pay for the delivered-pizza softens the poor etiquette of inviting oneself over) or you kiss said friends goodbye.  They’re busy and they’re not sleeping, they don’t have time to think about inviting you over, much as they’d love to see you.

Could it have been seven months since I first met Violet?  She wasn’t quite a year old, but she was standing while holding onto things, like tables or your hands.  How old are babies when they can first stand?

All I know is, she got fat.  Even though months had passed, it felt to me like I was literally seeing her one day, almost not-alive, and then the next, magically brought back to full-on, scrumptious-baby life.  Like you closed your eyes and made a wish and when you opened them, there she fucking was, safe, and the most beautiful sight you’d ever seen.

I’m calling A by an initial instead of a full made-up name, by the way, because I can’t think of one right now that matches his pretty, real one, while her fake one came naturally.  Anyway, A liked her, even though she was at the stage of being able to follow him around and get in his every bit of business.  They are two really nice little people.  Violet though is basically the sweetest-spririted person I ever met.  It’s eerie.

I know there’s a tendency to romanticize babies and anyone you love, and/or especially sometimes if they’ve had any kind of suffering – “oh they’re so saintly, it’s now extra-sad that they got hurt.”  I personally find it sorrowful when a-holes get hurt too, and I’ve met babies who I did secretly think were a-holes (secret’s out now I guess, ahem), so believe me when I tell you that Violet has this mellow, happy-for-no-reason-I-can-discern personality that makes me just feel like, fuck, I can’t wait to know this person when she’s an adult, too.  To have a friend with her heart, to get to love her for years and years.

So it’s hard to tell where that, and not wanting her to get hurt again and not trusting that she’ll be safe with her birth mother, ends, and all KINDS of privilege and racist misogyny begin.  In me, I mean.  Her mom did almost kill her.  But, her mom was 15 when she got pregnant.  She was, herself, a baby by my standards.  And who the fuck was worrying about who/what might almost kill her?

She came to Los Angeles from Mexico and stayed with friends of her family.  A hetero married couple.  The husband raped her.  I don’t know whether how it went down would qualify in misogynists’ eyes as “real rape”or “statutory rape,” all I can tell you for sure is that a grown man raped a 15 year old child either fucking way.  And what I heard was that he got to keep his family and his life intact, while hers shattered.

Her brother and sister in law reluctantly “took her in” after she got impregnated via rape.  Those home-wreckin’, whorish girl child rape victims, doncha know, always bringing shame to The Family.  She was 16 when Violet was born.  I wish I knew the name Violet’s mother gave her; I feel like I could use it safely, and I feel like it’s hers.

My first thought when E and L told me that Violet’s mom -sorry I forgot I was going to call her “M” – when they first told me that M wanted Violet back and was somewhat-doing the court ordered things she needed to do to make that happen, I thought “of course she does.”  L and M had been having supervised-by-a-social-worker visits with Violet for a little while by then.  How could anyone, including and especially her mother, meet Violet and not want to jump through hoops to make off with her?  I’m sorry to put it crudely like that but I’m just telling you, if you met Violet, you’d know what I mean about the urge to just fucking grab her for yourself and never let go.  And this is from a baby-phobic, committed spinster, so.

My second thought was, please can her 16 year old self get a case of the selfish-es and decide she’d rather be a child herself for a little while longer than have to be somebody’s full time caretaker for the next 17 years? 

My third thought was to remember that she’s an undocumented worker here, and to catch my breath at the thought of her being deported, without Violet, and without a way to get Violet back then.  I mean it caught in my throat because it’s what I wanted to happen, for a second.  It was a shock of sickening – I don’t know what to call it besides hatred.  I mean, even though it didn’t feel like the anger-hatred-fuckin’-hate-somebody way that I normally think of hate, I think that’s still the correct word for it.  What else could it be, to wish for even a second for the immense suffering of one person as a price to be paid for the privilege you want someone else to receive?

So, it seems fair to say that I hated M for a second, for wanting Violet, for taking steps to get to be with her beautiful daughter again.  What if she neglects Violet again, or hits her or something, M has so little support, so little of anything, why can’t Violet stay with us (because now I’d decided I had some unearned claim to her as well), hey, why can’t M stay with us too?  Why can’t it be that instead of taking someone’s baby from her, when she herself is still a baby, that they both get to live better, be loved, have a family, have food, a nice place to live, be wanted, be cherished?  And although I know by far not all teenaged mothers nearly starve their babies to death, you can’t tell me that little girl is just some bad person who was trying to kill a baby.  You can’t tell me that little girl ever had a chance in any of this.  I am afraid for Violet to go live with her mom again, but I am enraged that a girl who was still young enough to be someone’s foster kid herself has become the supposed villain in this. 

I don’t know if they were saying it to soothe me or themselves or both, but when E and L told me they had to have faith that Violet would be okay either way, that faith was not contagious for me at first.  Maybe we’re just meant to be in her lives for this short time, maybe it’ll be something she does carry with her, we don’t know what her path is supposed to be.  They do mean it.  And they also are terrified, and angry, and heart broke.  They don’t want to blame this child, M, either.  They don’t want to wish the mother of someone they love so much any harm.  But they have.  Wished it, like I did.  And wanted to take it back.  And wished there was a way to hold on to Violet without it meaning we had to leave M out there, hanging, by herself, and now also with a broken heart, for lack of Violet in her arms.

The next court date is in August.  M has been missing a lot of the supervised visits, and some of the classes she’s supposed to be taking.  E and L can’t help themselves, they hope it means they will get to adopt Violet.  I haven’t felt as clear on it myself in a little while.

I want Violet to stay with E and L.  I just mean that it’s hard for me to know and love Violet now and not-think about her mom.  If Violet is this way, god can you imagine what the person she came from must be like?, is the kind of thoughts I have.  I want to know that M will be okay, too.  But she’s not been anyone’s concern in, who knows, years.  Or maybe her parents, maybe she has parents who are alive and are in Mexico and care about her.  Maybe they want to meet Violet.  But M came here, to the US, to live with a rapist and his resentful spouse, and has no money of her own, and no one she’s stayed with – the rapist or her brother and sister in law – has money either, or not the kind where they can support her and a baby at any rate.

So I think about borders and custody and laws and jails and courts and I just want to know, how can it be a happy ending if Violet stays?  Because if she stays, it means M is struggling, is, well, basically what she’s been the whole time – a child still, but now one who’s expected to succeed at life like adults are expected to, and maybe she was as afraid of babies as I was, when she had one.  Or maybe she was hungry too, or maybe it’s hard taking care of a baby, even one as non-fussy as Violet, when you’re in the trauma of having been raped.  Maybe it’s hard to take care of your rapist’s baby.

But either way, if M doesn’t get Violet back, it means M’s not really doing well.  Not able to show up for things.  Not able to prove income or a safe place to live.  For Violet to have this “better life” of living with upper middle class privilege and safety, M has to remain in or descend more fully into chaos and deprivation.  Nobody’s going to pluck her up and bring her to a loving couple who want the best for her.

So although the circumstances are very different between Violet’s story and the stolen baby and abused-by-the-system mother in Mississippi, the question of separation and erasure feels related to me, in both cases.  How could it be otherwise?

The upside of some people thinking you’re an asshole and some people suspecting it…

June 24, 2009 by joankelly6000

…is having not one fucking thing to lose.

Voz Latina is coming at BFP in bad faith.  It’s bullshit.  And you who support *that* are also full of shit.  There is a difference between thinking someone’s wrong and lying about them.  Some of you fucks could stand to study up on it.

I, too, hate when people lecture Palestinians to “use non-violence”

June 23, 2009 by joankelly6000

This post at flip flopping joy doesn’t have an author listed (that I can see?) so I’m not sure who wrote it although  it does sound like Mai’a’s voice to me?  Anyway, I really like the post because of the way she talks about what gets deemed violence vs. non-violence.  Whose violence is credited as such and whose is invisibilized, and how. 

Also liked it because someone told me as well (although it wasn’t Golda Meir of course) that “there is no such thing as a Palestinian.”  It was back in the days when I knew next to nothing about most things, including and especially the situation with Israel and Palestine.  “No one was there,” he said – nobody’s land was stolen, no one is currently being harmed or oppressed, there just is this disembodied hatred for Jewish people that somehow manifests in Arab bodies that appear in and around Israel for purposes of killing Jews whenever possible.  And it came up at all because I had been like, huh, I don’t understand why people don’t understand why Palestinians are angry.  Everybody else has/gets a country (so not true, but ah the blanket generalizing of youth), and both Palestinians and Jews have a right to just live, you know, so why are Palestinians being expected to just…take their shit and hit the road and get out of Israel’s hair?  It makes no sense.

That’s when the sense-making comment came about there being no such thing as Palestinians.

And it made me wonder – do Jewish Americans know as little about Israel’s history and present as I do and did?  Cuz I don’t know how you could ever have heard that some people still have the keys to the houses they were forced out of in the formation of Israel and simultaneousy believe there is no such thing as those people. 

And this man who told me all that, he’s neither religious nor intentionally a hurtful/hateful person.  He believed what he was telling me.  So is it just that Americans in general, Jewish or not, are as uneducated about everything as I and others think we are?  I don’t understand what else could be going on.

The Hatred Experience

June 22, 2009 by joankelly6000

I saw the movie The Girlfriend Experience.  I’m not sure but I think there was only one other woman who went to the showing I was at.  I think the men were somewhere around a dozen at most.  By the time the movie was over, it shocked me how much I felt like I hated every one of them.

The movie’s no advertisement for liking dudes, to be sure, but that’s not why I had to stay in my seat until all the males had left the theater.  I felt so close to emotionally out of control that I didn’t know whether I was going to burst into tears or pick a physical fight with any of them.  I’m guessing it would have been safe to bet on the former – I’ve never been in a fist fight nor am I itching to try it – but I’m just saying I felt like I could not walk in front of or behind any of them without fear of my own response.

The reason I felt this way about the men in the theater in particular is how they acted during the movie.  And what it made me think of, who it made me think of.  Spoiler alert if you’re going to see the movie – I’m going to talk about whatever I want, including possibly the ending or anything else revealing.

In case you’re not familiar, it’s a movie about a couple of days (I think, I’m not sure about the time line exactly but that’s what I thought it was) in the life of an escort, played by real life porn actress Sasha Grey.  Honestly 25% of why I went to see it (the other 75% being that there was nothing else out I wanted to see, and this movie was set in New York City, which I miss terribly) had to do with wanting to see if she struck me as the same amount of irritating on screen as she has in interviews.  She’s, uh, a little taken with her own I’m-smarter-and-more-together-than-coked-out-porn-stars-and-it’s-important-that-everyone-sees-me-as-smarter-and-more-together-than-them-ness.  But, she’s also really young.  And I have to say that pretty early on in the film if not immediately, I loved her character in a way that made me feel like, eh, what’s a little over-inflated ego in youngsters anyway, I officially have stopped finding her irritating in real life as well!

I’ve seen other reviewers say stuff about her supposed flat affect in the film – and the supposed deep philosophical question of whether Sasha Grey herself is just like that and so that’s why the character seemed/felt that way to them, or if that’s how the director wanted it played. 

But she didn’t feel flat to me – not as a character and not as an actor playing that character.  And, although I was never beautiful like that when I was young (or I mean ever – it’s a pretty specific standard of mainstream hotness) and I never made that kind of money or lived the way that character lives, materially or otherwise, I still related to her.  I still felt protective of her – of people hurting her, of the parts of her that were vulnerable, of her right to be as guarded as she tried to be – and I don’t know if that’s what made me feel like I loved her or if I would have anyway.  Didn’t seem like anyone else in the theater had the same response.

Which is to say, men in the audience laughed during what was for me the creepiest scene in the movie – from actually its first frame until the scene was over.  It was of a “hobbyist” – I don’t know where this name came from but for the uninitiated it means “fucking disgusting fuckers who try to blackmail whores into fucking/blowing them for free or else they’ll write that she has boils on her ass and communicable diseases and bad breath on top of it all, on online message boards where fucking disgusting fuckers compare notes about whores, ostensibly for the purposes of sharing information but factually for the purposes of making themselves feel superior to people they hate (women, specifically whores) and whose vaginas they resent not getting a constant free whack at” – who lures the character, Chelsea, to his goblin’s cave of an apartment at the back of his dad’s furniture store.

This hobbyist promises obviously ridiculous things to Chelsea, which she seems reluctant to believe, and I’m not really sure why she ended up fucking him for free anyway.  The scene just shows him talking to her and trying to talk her into doing him, and then it’s only later that you find out that they did some physical stuff, although I wasn’t even sure exactly what all they did.  More on that in a minute. 

Anyway, a guy who does not have much money is by definition not a guy who is taking bunches of escorts to Dubai for multi-thousand dollar jaunts of mutual profitability.  That’s a typical part of the blackmail though – it’s equal parts “if you do this, I can make you a STAR in whoreland!” and “if you don’t do this, I will RUIN YOU!”

So anyway, these horrible people in the theater with me thought that scene was HIGHlarious.  From the time he let her into his back-of-store apartment to his lies about what he could do for her.  They also laughed at another point where this other character is saying all women are the lowest form of evil, that we’re hyenas.  (I find hyenas cute and I don’t know why they’re considered bad but nonetheless it’s hateful to equate women with some creature you think is not only beneath humans but beneath any redemptive quality whatsoever.)

The movie is – what’s it called when a movie jumps around in time instead of having one linear story?  Whatever it is, it resulted in a scene towards the end where Chelsea is telling another client about the hobbyist, after a voiceover of the hobbyist  reciting his horrible “review” of her that he’s presumably posting online.  She’s clearly upset when she gets to the later cilent’s hotel room – and it’s their first time meeting.  This client is also a horrible person, beyond just a person who thinks women are purchase-able objects.  He does another not-exactly-rare thing that happens in the sex industry, where a charming, handsome dude pretends to be sensitive and pretends to feel a “real connection” with you, and talks about wanting to basically treat you fantastically, over and above just being a client who maybe is pleasant enough to fuck and pays you what you ask.

So this client pretends to be human, and to treat her humanly, and asks her to talk about why she’s clearly upset, and she does.  And she cries telling him that the hobbyist made her put a Q-tip in her private parts, sounded like it was for some kind of swab-to-see-if-you-have-cooties test, because she said something along the lines of “he made me do that and meanwhile he hadn’t even showered in three days!”  The upshot was it hurt her feelings that this hobbyist horriblist went out of his way to show her that she was a Dirty Whore.  And that she felt like she had to take it.  At least, we’re never given another scene or dialogue about it that shows she slapped him and left or anything.

So she cries telling the client this, and he acts all empathetic, and later that same day he asks her to go away with him for the weekend.  “I’m supposed to fly home to my wife (he’s from L.A.) and kids but there’s something so strong between us I’m canceling my trip and staying the weekend, I want to take you to this bitchen rich-people resort thing upstate, I’ll send a car,” type of thing.  Chelsea goes home and tells her live-in boyfriend about it.  And that she intends to go.

Here’s also why I felt love for this character – she was kind of a dizzy broad.  Which is a type of person I have an involuntary soft spot for.  She referred to some strange not-exactly-astrology-but-I-couldn’t-tell-you-what-in-fact-it-WAS type of belief system/books she had based on people’s birthdays and other stuff, and from that system she somehow extrapolated that this client guy could be someone special in her life.

I don’t blame the boyfriend for being upset about the idea of her running off with some other person who she was saying it could be more than just business with.  I still didn’t like his condescension, and this is also misogyny that I see a fair amount of in the world but that perhaps gets little air time because of so much else that goes on, but -

There’s being angry at someone/at what they’re doing/saying and talking about that even with high emotions running, and then there’s your true colors coming out during arguments.  If you don’t already feel superior to someone, the behavior of being condescending towards them in a fight is simply not going to come up.  All kinds of other shit may, but not that.  So I disliked him, as I dislike it whenever I see men do that, for using the cover of his understandably hurt feelings to indulge in his look-down-his-nose-at-the-silly-woman bullshit.

Here’s where I talk about the ending, and is half of why I felt like crying in the theater.  That client who asked her to go away with him, he did send the car.  It took her to the resort.  And he called her a little while after she got there to tell her he wasn’t coming.

I don’t expect the world to stop turning on its axis and people take time out to care, like I do, about a rich escort getting heartbroke by a would-be client.  Although I will say – the reason it hit a nerve in me is that of the time I spent in the sex industry, I became familiar through my own and other women’s experiences with that dynamic.  This was “just a movie” but it happens in real life, too.

And I guess I just don’t see much difference when it comes to women being discarded, disposable, and the pain of having thought for even a moment that someone didn’t see you that way, only to find out they do.  When you know up front that they do (see you as disposable), it’s not like it makes your day, but it’s also not like you get your hopes up at all.  That part of the movie just made me think of how it’s one more way that prostitutes get dehumanized.  Because she’s young and white and rich and beautiful, men resent her for being some(thing) they want and can’t just have unlimited access to for free.  *Her* being rejected is like the ultimate payback to them, knocked off her pedestal, never mind that she’s a fucking kid still and wants to feel love like everybody does.  Which is different than wanting free fuck-access to someone or demanding it of everyone in a certain class of people.

The other reason this movie jarred me the way it did was that I had a semi-similar experience myself right when I was getting out of the kinky sex industry full time, re: the hobbyist.

To keep a long story short-ish – a human-shaped puddle of vomit tried to get me to do a free session with him as repayment for him supposedly helping me make money through two other avenues.  Neither of which he turned out to be able to actually wield any power in, incidentally, which is not the reason I turned him down, but of course is more reason to hate his lying ass.

I was broke and desperate and trying not to be a total asshole to him in case he wasn’t lying about the other stuff, but he sprung the whole “hey I was hoping we could play a little” thing on me when I stopped by his troll hole to pick up a videotape.  It’s not even like he asked and I said “hm,” or “maybe,” or anything – I had no idea it was on the agenda.  He was a friend of a (not actually but thought at the time) friend who was looking for someone for some project, he was never a potential client as far as I knew.

Anyway, his anger at my saying no and leaving instead of giving in to his pressure to get naked and tie him up or let him tie me up that day was pretty solid.  And I just thought, in watching The Girlfriend Experience, about how many women – way younger than me (I was late 30’s at the time), many more kinds of desperate than I was – have been subjected to guys who are like, “nope, having you as a buyable object isn’t enough subjugation – I gotta get ‘it’ for FREE, bitch!”

Sometimes I just want men to stop hating us for the simple reason that I need a break in the experience of hating them back for it.  I just want some peace, you know.  Not gonna find it in this movie, in case that wasn’t clear by now.

There’s something wrong with me

June 22, 2009 by joankelly6000

Exposure to radical feminism is not ruining my sex life.

Even though I’ve been reading and getting riled up by radical feminist writings of many kinds for years, up to and including the most radical ideas I’ve ever heard in the last year or so from a particular blogger, it is actually males themselves, not party-pooping anti-sexers!, who kill my drive to fuck males, if/when it does get killed.

Granted, I was pretty put off the whole sex thing when thinking about it head-on for the first time, thanks to Dworkin and others, as a young person.  But it was because of the kind of sex I’d been having.  And that chicken came before the egg – if I hadn’t been having coerced sex, or hadn’t been sexually abused prior, or hadn’t been living in a woman-hating/sex-pressuring/whore-stigmatizing culture before coming across various texts, my eyes wouldn’t have had anything to open to.  And of the stuff I’ve done that has felt good to me, has been what I sought out and was glad to have – no amount of any radical feminist’s perceived disapproval makes me suddenly go “oh dear jesus I was actually raped!” or impede my ability to go have more of it.

It is apparent, to me anyway, that I do have a near-indestructible sex drive.  It just isn’t radical feminism that’s ever put it to the test, or dampened it in the least. 

I’m as fuck-crazed as anybody I’ve ever met, and I just would like to know where all the confessional “oo I know I’m not supposed to admit to this” conversations are about what it is about *men* that makes fucking men ever aversive.  I’m not even talking about what most people would think of as rape.  I’m saying that I see people sometimes being all “oh my god, radical-feminist-at-large, you are such a girl-boner-kill!” but I don’t see a lot of people talking about how regular old dudes ruin sex all the fucking time as a matter of course.

And, I daresay, if heterosexual sex is the best thing since sliced bread, how in the world could some cranky old broad’s nay-saying be powerful enough to make it unappealing and make you miss out on it?  It makes me think of help-the-gays-are-contagious arguments.  (If “opposite” fucking is so natural and such the lord’s will, how could it be weak enough to be threatened by something as supposedly curable as same sex fuckery?)

People have their own experiences, and this is mine: there is nothing any radical feminist could say about men that is as good an argument for not fucking them as *men themselves* are.  And radical feminists aren’t on my street at 2am, following me if I happen to want to be outside at that time of night, hurting my feelings for still fucking dudes, either.

How  ’bout:

Dear  Men,

Stop being terrible, and no one can talk people out of fucking you, including inadvertantly you.